Tuesday, June 29, 2010

FIFA can no longer ignore issue of video replay

This has gone on for too long. Something has to give.

There have been too many instances where referees have disallowed goals in games of the highest magnitude that have severely effected the outcome of the game.

Case and point: England vs Germany.

The round of 16 match between these two sides should have unfolded completely differently. While I’m not saying the outcome should have been reversed, as Germany were the better side on that day, however, the game dynamic should have been much different.

Frank Lampard’s goal was clearly in. Many people questioned whether England's 1966 goal against Germany was good, but should have been absolutely no questions about this one.

Had the game been tied 2-2 at half time, the second half might have been much different. But instead England emerged from the first half a deflated team. Having scored two goals in under a minute, they should have been riding momentum into the next 45 minutes.


A similar situation occurred when the United States had a goal disallowed in their match against Slovenia – a goal which would have handed the USA three points instead of one in a game there rightly deserved to win.

These are simply two instances in the past couple weeks, but the issues has been a problem for far too long.

So, what do we do about this?

FIFA has stated that instituting video replay will slow down the game, something many fans are also not willing to witness.

However, this may not necessarily be the case. Look at rugby, for instance. Video referees can be called upon by the match official to determine the outcome of an attempt to score.

It would not take much for a soccer match to implement a fifth official to be used as a video referee who can help determine the outcome of highly influential and important decisions. Especially a match of such high magnitude such as a World Cup game, or even in the Champions league.

It wouldn’t take long for that official to review the play and radio his decisions to the head referee. Hell, it would take less time for that, than the amount of time wasted while the players argue with the referee over stupid calls - calls which could be eliminated with replay.

Barring this, FIFA could potentially look into having a goal judge – a referee who stands on each goal line for the entire match and whose purpose is to determine whether the ball crosses the goal line or not.

The only potential problem with this is that clearly some referees seem to have trouble with depth perception, so this may not be a solution at all

If none of these seem an appropriate solution, then FIFA might as well do away with referees all together, since they don’t seem to be doing much to enhance the game.

No, but seriously, something needs to be done about this, preferably before the beautiful game evolves into a sport of inconsistencies and meaningless outcomes.

4 comments:

  1. It sounds like they are going to be reconsidering it:

    "'It is obvious that after the experience so far in this World Cup it would be nonsense to not reopen the file of technology at the business meeting of the International FA Board in July,' [FIFA President Sepp] Blatter told a press briefing here Tuesday."

    See the full article here: http://g.ca.sports.yahoo.com/soccer/world-cup/news/world-cup-s-best-call-blatter-reconsiders-replay--fbintl_dw-blatter062910.html

    PS - Go Ghana!

    ReplyDelete
  2. While they're at it, they might as well have something to cover the offside rule.

    If you think about it, how is it even humanly possible for the linesman to be watching the passer and the player near the last defender?

    Answer: it's not.

    Unfortunately, knowing FIFA, this whole movement is going to be a painfully slow one in my opinion.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree with the blatant fact that FIFA needs to start using technology for goals but I don't think that would have made one lick of difference in the England game...I hope you keep posting now that England is eliminated...

    ReplyDelete
  4. Yes I am definitely going to keep posting! Just been really busy seeing Calgary, but I've got another one almost finished!

    ReplyDelete